IT Professionals Might be Looking Elsewhere for Employment

James McGovern’s latest post on Enterprise Architecture discusses how many enterprise architects are favoring contract/consultant work over permanent work because of the better paying opportunities and offers.

Enterprise architecture in general might suffer is some of the more qualified IT professionals are leaving organizations for contract work. Another point that James brings up is that perhaps HR isn’t allowing for much flexibility on salary compensation for enterprise architects. Is your company currently using consultants for its enterprise architecture initiatives?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Return on Investment or Return on Information?

Anton Venter’s latest post on the IT Knowledge Exchange argues that the real ROI of EA comes from information and its use. Anton makes another great point that documentation of architecture makes finding information easier and readily available. It also becomes easier to provide outsourcers info on the architecture should they need it to support an organization’s applications. What do you think is the real ROI of enterprise architecture?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Putting the "E" in TOGAF: An EAdirections Webinar

In our attempt to deliver the latest updates and insights within the EA space, we’ve scheduled a series of free webinars that will happen over the next couple of months. The first webinar in the series “Putting the "E" in TOGAF: An EAdirections Webinar,” will be presented by three managing directors of EAdirections: Larry R. DeBoever, George S. Paras, and Tim Westbrock. Register now for the webinar on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 from 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EDT to save your webinar seat. Here’s a brief description of the webinar and what you can expect to take out of it by attending:

A number of EA practitioners have concluded that TOGAF is not an effective framework (and ADM is not an effective methodology) for Enterprise(wide) Architecture. TOGAF does not cover aligning long-term corporate strategy with IT, and positions EA as a reactive, rather than proactive, approach. In fairness, many have expressed similar concerns about other EA frameworks and methodologies. This webinar explores the “enterprise-ishness” of TOGAF. We discuss our experiences and practical techniques for extending TOGAF (and other frameworks) to significantly increase its effectiveness across the Enterprise.

If you are a Chief Architect or IT manager evaluating EA frameworks, or if you are struggling to apply TOGAF (or another framework), on an enterprise-wide basis, then this webinar is for you. Topics will include:

What you will learn:

• What are the types of enterprise-wide requirements that users of TOGAF struggle with?
• What are the enterprise-wide architectural activities that EA teams should be performing without a clear ‘Business Requirement’?
• How should an Enterprise Architecture account for the fact that most enterprises do not have an ‘end state’ but rather continually adjust to changing markets and opportunities for innovation?
• Are the artifacts produced by TOGAF effective for communicating with the Board and the Executive Committee? If not, can they be made ‘consumable’?

This webinar is being brought to you by the Enterprise Architectures Conference, don’t forget to take a look at the lineup of speakers we have this year. Click on the link below to register for the free webinar.

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/924415223

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Models and Leadership in Enterprise Architecture

What matters most in enterprise architecture? Is it the business model, or the people who lead the organization? Chris Potts reviews this question in his latest post on CIO. One of the points Chris brings up relates to the Economist’s article "No Size Fits All", which explores whether the business model or the people managing it were responsible for the credit crunch.

According to Chris, replicating a business model within organizations does not guarantee success or failure. Only people, ex: customers, suppliers, partners, and employees are able to make a model work. Chris states that business instead, should start on the right hand side like the Zachman Framework for EA (Who, When, Why), not the left (What, How, Where).

Is your organization more concerned with its structure than management?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

The Goals of EA

Every organization defines the goals of Enterprise Architecture in their own distinct way. Anton Venter lists six goals of practicing enterprise architecture in his latest post on the IT Knowledge Exchange. Here they are:

1. Successful and timely Business transformation
2. Bringing models and views together by implementing universal compatibility between them (integrating everything and using a common language)
3. Going on-line, e.g. by using a portal
4. Maintaining a balance between strategic enterprise-wide goals and the operational and tactical needs of individual business units or segments
5. Focusing on short- and medium-term Business benefits
6. Focusing on 20% of major threats and opportunities that will have an 80% impact on the Business

What are your company’s goals of practicing EA? Do they differ from Anton’s?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Carphone Warehouse sees benefits to SOA

As reported by this article at CIO, Carphone Warehouse, a mobile phone retailer in the UK, moved to SOA in 2005. Even though they saw immediate benefits, there were other things that were still falling behind in their IT system. There were still 53% of new service designs that were failing governance tests the first time and there was still duplication in some of the services performed.

As a result, they adopted HP Systinet. This SOA governance tool helped 95% of new service designs pass the governance test. It has also estimated that this new software will save them £526,000 over the next three years, due to the avoidance of duplicating processes. It also will allow the IT department to deliver new services to the business in the shortest amount of time possible.

Do you think that corporations selling SOA governance tools are starting to respond more to customers needs?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Enterprise and Architecture: Where Does the Balance Lie?

Chris Potts reminds us in his latest post on CIO where the balance lies between the Enterprise and Architecture.

He begins his explanation with a definition of Enterprise which is used in economics – the ‘animal spirits’ of the entrepreneur. This is where he gets his expression “the tiger and the toolbox”. Futher on Chris explains how companies must not be too focused on being too much toolbox as opposed to tiger. What does this mean? Companies too often end up concentrating more on frameworks, models, techniques instead being out there in the corporate jungle influencing and shaping the enterprise.

The real benefit comes when the enterprise drives the architecture and not vice versa.

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

The definition of SOA

An article at CIO recently defined service oriented architecture as:

a broad, standards-based framework in which services are built, deployed, managed, and orchestrated in pursuit of new and much more agile IT infrastructures that respond swiftly to shifting business demands.

Also according to the article, SOA also has the potential to reduce your IT costs and improve your business agility, all while taking many of the tools already at use in the organization and conforming them to a new structure that will help align the business.

Do you agree with this definition, if not, what would you change?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

The Government’s Incremental Move Towards SOA

This latest post on the SOA Network details how the latest report from Input, a leader in the authority of government business, discusses that the government’s growing adoption of SOA practices will fundamentally change how it delivers internal citizen-facing services. The federal market can benefit from increased agility and better IT alignment that SOA brings to the table.

Deniece Peterson, senior analyst at INPUT mentions:

"SOA shifts the concept of the application into a highly dynamic and fluid marketplace of plug-and-play services. A function previously performed by one vendor's application could now be completed by a number of discrete services provided by a multitude of providers. The standardized environment required to make this happen could severely impact the provider who relies heavily on proprietary elements for competitive advantage."

It is still early in the process to see a dramatic change in the federal SOA market as SOA solutions are slowly being integrated into the customer’s environment. The findings from Input can be found here, “Service-Oriented Architecture: Implications for Government and Industry”.

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

EA Can Not Change the Nature of Your Business

Neil Ward-Dutton provides a different perspective of EA in his latest post on Advising on IT-Business Alignment. Neil states that even though EA is extremely effective, it is at best only shaping the way that IT supports changing business conditions and not “changing” business focus. New forces (new product launches and development, acquisitions and mergers, new regulations) will always drive business to further develop its technology focus. The best EA teams provide a way for organizations to adapt to these changes with the least amount of stress possible. Do you think that enterprise architects are realigning or “architecting” the enterprise?

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/

Enterprise Architecture constantly leads to a competitive advantage

Paul van der Merwe, consulting manager at Real IRM recently took the time to talk about the Harvard Business study and the benefits of strong enterprise architecture. Enterprise architecture can lead to much more than a competitive advantage when it comes to your business. Along with the competitive advantage, EA can bring profits, market leadership and a sustainable business model.

The Harvard Business report showed that these were the effects of having a strong business structure:

* More competitive, especially in terms of entering new markets and launching new products and services.

* More profitable, both through increasing revenues and slashing costs.

* More easily able to embrace change, including regulatory change.

* Able to remove duplicate and redundant processes, including the IT systems which support these processes.

* Able to cut IT costs (by up to 25%), identify payback on IT and more easily merge the goals of business and IT.

* Able to manage their data more easily, with less manual rekeying of data, and reduced data error and redundancy.

We're getting ready to launch a new blog that looks at the broader issues of Enterprise Architecture, update your RSS feed now as we get it ready for our official launch: http://evolveea.blogspot.com/